Do I need backend with GraphQL?
Table of Contents
Do I need backend with GraphQL?
No. GraphQL is an API technology so it can be used in any context where an API is required. On the backend, a GraphQL server can be implemented in any programming language that can be used to build a web server.
Which language is best for GraphQL?
TypeScript will become the dominant language for writing GraphQL APIs with Node. JS. With its strongly-typed schema, GraphQL is best used in combination with typed languages.
Does GraphQL replace backend?
No, not necessarily. They both handle APIs and can serve similar purposes from a business perspective. GraphQL is often considered an alternative to REST, but it’s not a definitive replacement.
What are the 2 most common actions in GraphQL?
Actions can be of two types:
- Query action: An action of type query extends the query root of the Hasura schema. This means that you can execute this action through a GraphQL query.
- Mutation action: An action of type mutation extends the mutation root of the Hasura schema.
What is GraphQL good for?
GraphQL allows making multiple resources request in a single query call, which saves a lot of time and bandwidth by reducing the number of network round trips to the server. It also helps to save waterfall network requests, where you need to resolve dependent resources on previous requests.
What are alternatives to GraphQL?
GraphQL, Cube. js, Apollo, Oracle PL/SQL, and Oracle PL/SQL are the most popular alternatives and competitors to graphql.
Why do we need Apollo for GraphQL?
GraphQL and Apollo help you ship features faster Distinct front-end clients for multiple platforms (web, iOS, etc.), each with different data requirements. A backend that serves data to clients from multiple sources (Postgres, Redis, etc.) Complex state and cache management for both the frontend and the backend.
Which database is best for GraphQL?
Dgraph Cloud. The only native GraphQL graph database built for the cloud.
Is GraphQL good?
Is GraphQL bad? Certainly not; GraphQL is great if you want to work in a declarative style because it enables you to select only the information or operations you need. However, depending on your use case, performance requirements, and tolerance for unnecessary complexity, GraphQL could be a bad fit for your project.
Why is GraphQL less likely to be versioned?
GraphQL reduces the redundancy of sending over data the client does not need and natively aggregates granular REST requests to a purpose built ones based on the customer request. In addition ot also takes away a lot of the considerations developers need to spend time on when versioning REST APIs.
Why GraphQL is a bad idea?
Why GraphQL could be a bad fit GraphQL queries could cause performance issues. GraphQL makes some tasks more complex. It’s easier to use a web cache with REST than with GraphQL. The way GraphQL schemas work could be a problem.
What is GraphQL and why should you use it?
But in GraphQL, every field and nested object can get its own set of arguments, making GraphQL a complete replacement for making multiple API fetches. You can even pass arguments into scalar fields, to implement data transformations once on the server, instead of on every client separately. Arguments can be of many different types.
What are the different directives in GraphQL?
The core GraphQL specification includes exactly two directives, which must be supported by any spec-compliant GraphQL server implementation: @include(if: Boolean) Only include this field in the result if the argument is true. @skip(if: Boolean) Skip this field if the argument is true.
What is the difference between rest and GraphQL?
In a system like REST, you can only pass a single set of arguments – the query parameters and URL segments in your request. But in GraphQL, every field and nested object can get its own set of arguments, making GraphQL a complete replacement for making multiple API fetches.
What is the use of __typename field in GraphQL?
GraphQL allows you to request __typename, a meta field, at any point in a query to get the name of the object type at that point. In the above query, search returns a union type that can be one of three options. It would be impossible to tell apart the different types from the client without the __typename field.