Are Stoics rationalists?

The prevailing scholarly opinion is that the Stoics are empiricists rather than rationalists. Empiricism is a branch of epistemology that gives priority to sense-perception whereas rationalism gives priority to reason’s grasp of necessary truths.

Is Aristotle a rationalist philosopher?

Books could be written on this question, but, in a nutshell, Aristotle was both rationalist and empiricist. He was not mystic, unlike Plato who got the mathematical or mystical insight about a possible “invisible” reality.

Is Plato’s philosophy based upon empiricism?

To put it very simply, Plato was a rationalist. The real world was an illusion of a perfect world. For one, this means our senses, as empiricists used, were ineffective and fallible.

How are rationalists different from empiricists?

The main difference between Rationalism And Empiricism is that rationalism is the knowledge that is derived from reason and logic while on the other hand empiricism is the knowledge that is derived from experience and experimentation. Rationalism is about intuition while empiricism is about visual concepts.

What is stoic rationalism?

Stoicism is a school of Hellenistic philosophy founded by Zeno of Citium in Athens in the early 3rd century BC. The Stoics also held that certain destructive emotions resulted from errors of judgment, and they believed people should aim to maintain a will (called prohairesis) that is “in accordance with nature”.

What is the difference between the rationalists and the empiricists who do you support and why?

Both these schools of thought are concerned with the source of knowledge and justification. The main difference between rationalism and empiricism is that rationalism considers reason as the source of knowledge whereas empiricism considers experience as the source of knowledge.

Is Aristotle stoic?

In brief, Aristotle believes that we cannot be happy without at least some external goods, while the Stoics insist that we can. Thus, for both Aristotle and the Stoics, happiness is inseparable from the possession and exercise of the virtues. Differences remain, though.

Was Plato a rationalist or empiricist?

In that regard, Plato is prior to the discussion of rationalism and empiricism temporally, but that’s not entirely fair to your question because as an answer this misses it’s spirit. To the spirit of your question, Plato would more commonly be aligned with rationalist forms of thought.

Was Aristotle’s thought more empirically based than Plato’s?

It is commonly agreed that Aristotle’s thought, at least about the natural world, was much more empirically based than Plato’s.

What is the difference between rationalism and empiricism?

For the rationalists, knowledge was based upon thought and deriving an understanding of the universe from within thought as a medium, where the empiricists looked to the world and argued that the excesses of thought were extrapolations from the world.

What are the sources of our knowledge about Stoicism?

Here, however, we meet with the problem about the sources of our knowledge about Stoicism. We do not possess a single complete work by any of the first three heads of the Stoic school: the ‘founder,’ Zeno of Citium in Cyprus (344–262 BCE), Cleanthes (d. 232 BCE) or Chrysippus (d. ca. 206 BCE).