How big was the Soviet army at the end of ww2?

By war’s end the Soviet armed forces numbered 11,365,000 officers and men. Demobilization, however, started toward the end of 1945, and in a few years the armed forces fell to fewer than 3,000,000 troops.

How big was the Soviet army at its peak?

The size of the Army throughout most time of the Cold War remained between 4 million and 5 million, according to Western estimates. Soviet law required all able-bodied males of age to serve a minimum of 2 years. As a result, the Soviet Army remained the largest active army in the world from 1945 to 1991.

How big was the Soviet army in 1939?

1,800,000 men
On the outbreak of the Second World War in 1939 the Red Army had an estimated 1,800,000 men in its ranks, of whom one fourth were stationed in the Far East.

How big was the Soviet army in 1950?

4 All in all, the Soviet armed forces were estimated to have around 5.5 million men under arms in the mid-1950s, ground forces approximately 2.5 to 2.8 million troops. 4Royal Institute for International Affairs, 1950, p.

Was the Soviet Army Strong?

By the end of World War II, the Soviet Union had a standing army of 10 to 13 million men. During and right after the war, the Red Army was by far the most powerful land army in the world.

How strong was the Soviet Army?

What was the size of a Soviet rifle company?

The Soviet Rifle company had 177 men with 27 sub-machine guns, 12 light machine guns, three 50mm mortars, and 2 heavy machine guns. Although its firepower was slightly greater, its means of command, control and logistics were inferior. Not only was the HQ smaller, but it lacked radio and there were only 2 horse-towed wagons for the full company.

What is the difference between the Soviet and French armies?

As this graph shows, there is quite a difference between the Soviet and French armies in the early years however both armies proportion of loss declines over the course of the war and reach similar levels by the end.

How many soldiers are in a German platoon?

The German platoon consisted of 4 squads, a light mortar team for added firepower and a headquarters with 3 messengers, a stretcher bearer and an HQ leader supporting the platoon commander. This unit was 49 men strong with 5 sub-machine guns, 4 light machine guns, and 1 light 50mm mortar.

Is there any value in comparing Soviet losses to First World War?

Given this difficulty in comparing two very different conflicts during the Second World War, there might be more value in comparing Soviet losses to the losses of the First World War because these armies directly engaged the German army in ground fighting over a sustained period.