Guidelines

How could a society without property operate what would be the basis of socialist society class 9?

How could a society without property operate what would be the basis of socialist society class 9?

EXPLANATION: Cooperatives would be associated with the people who could work together and produce the goods. They could later share the profits as per the work that would be done. Some socialists were of the opinion that the government should encourage the cooperatives.

How would a society without property operate what would be the basis of socialist society?

Hunting and gathering forest produce would be the only activities in such a society as there would be no initiative to go into agriculture and produce a surplus. It wouldn’t be a socialist society as well. Strong people would be able to feed for themselves but the weak will depend endlessly on their loved ones.

READ ALSO:   How do I turn on speaker for Skype on Android?

What is the basis for socialism?

Socialism is a political, social, and economic philosophy encompassing a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership of the means of production. It includes the political theories and movements associated with such systems.

How could a society without property operate what would be the basis of?

Its only in socialist economies that societies could operate without owning any property. In a socialist society, the state owns factories, lands, banks and other resources.

What were the views of socialists on private property?

Complete answer: Socialists were against private property. They saw it as the root of all social evils. ii) Socialists favored society as a whole rather than single individually owned property. More attention would be paid to collective social interests.

Why was the socialist against private property?

Socialists were against the institution of private property because they felt that it was the basis of all the social troubles. Therefore, socialist wanted the whole population to control the property rather than an individual so that more attention would be paid to collective social interests.

READ ALSO:   How Do I Stop overthinking with a guy?

Why were the socialist against private property and saw it as the root of all social ills?

Socialists were against private property because they saw it as the root of all social ills of the time. Individuals owned the property that gave employment but the propertied were concerned only with personal gain and not with the welfare of those who made the property productive.

What would a society without property look like?

A society without property will not be a productive society. Thus it stays at the primitive level. Hunting and gathering forest produce would be the only activities in such a society as there would be no initiative to go into agriculture and produce a surplus. It wouldn’t be a socialist society as well.

What will happen if there is no private ownership in society?

For a socialist society, public will be the owner these. For capitalist society the above mentioned components of production will be under private ownership. Now let come to the point, if there is a society without private ownership, the society will not be able to maintain its growth and prosperity.

READ ALSO:   How can I prepare for IES exam without coaching?

Should governments encourage co-operatives to replace capitalism?

They wanted that governments must encourage co-operatives and replace capitalist enterprise. This was propagated by Louis Blanc in France. They said that cooperatives were to be associations of people who produced goods together and divided the profits according to the work done by members. More ideas were added to this body of arguments.

What are some examples of socialistic activities?

The only socialistic activity would be a strong person collecting two fruits or hunting two animals instead of one for the sake of the weak men of his/her tribe. This wouldn’t even occur if the society is based in harsh regions like deserts, where a weak person would be seen as a liability by the tribe.