Is Laetrile legal in Australia?

Unfortunately, taking Laetrile, or eating apricot kernels in large amounts, is not only ineffective at treating cancer but could also be very dangerous. The sale of raw apricot kernels was prohibited in Australia and New Zealand from December 2015.

What is B17 vitamin used for?

Vitamin B17 is a commonly used name for a chemical called amygdalin. Typically sourced from apricot pits and bitter almonds, amygdalin is used to make laetrile—a compound often claimed to aid in the treatment of cancer, despite little evidence of its safety or effectiveness.

Where can you get B17?

Amygdalin, the compound that vitamin B17 derives from, can come from a variety of foods , including raw nuts, such as bitter almonds. It can also come from the pips of fruits, such as apricot kernels….Food sources

• nuts.
• crushed fruit pits.
• raw almonds.
• carrots.
• apricots.
• peaches.
• celery.
• beans.

What is the difference between vitamin B-17 and laetrile?

Vitamin B-17 is another name for amygdalin, a naturally-occurring molecule that is found in high concentration in apricot kernels, and is also found in over 1,200 other foods. Laetrile is a purified and concentrated form of amygdalin from apricot kernels that was created for use in laboratory and cancer treatments.

What is the difference between amygdalin and vitamin B17 (B17)?

Vitamin B17 is a commonly used name for a chemical called amygdalin. Typically sourced from apricot pits and bitter almonds, amygdalin is used to make laetrile (a compound said to aid in the treatment of cancer). Although they’re frequently referred to as “vitamin B17,” neither amygdalin nor laetrile is truly a B vitamin.

What is the source of vitamin B17?

It properties have been used and studied extensively for well over 100 years. The most common source of B17 is the apricot kernel although it can be found in other fruits.

Is laetrile an effective alternative oncology treatment for cancer?

Whether called laetrile or amygdalin or Vitamin B-17, this natural substance has been shown to be controversial alternative oncology treatment. Critics say it is at best ineffective and at worst potentially toxic. Advocates point to years of positive results and no known cases of cyanide toxicity.