Is the defendant in 12 Angry Men innocent?

Twelve Angry Men: Juror’s Trial Each one of the jurors came to their own decision deciding whether or not the defendant was guilty of the crime or not. The rising action in the play is that only Juror #8 found the defendant innocent and all the other jurors found him guilty of the crime.

What is the verdict at the end of 12 Angry Men?

In the end, the teen is found not guilty, and the jurors go their separate ways; the thunderstorm that has been building throughout the film passes, the clouds break, the music swells, and we turn off the film content that justice was done. But was it?

How is the boy innocent in Twelve Angry Men?

In the play, “Twelve Angry Men” by Reginald Rose, the jury made the right decision to acquit the boy of the murder case because of the discussion of the evidence and of the reenactments of several scenes of the murder. He also claims it took him 15 seconds to get to his door, and see the boy run out.

How was the problem solved in 12 Angry Men?

By the jury separating from bigotry, the tenth juror realized his error, changed his vote to not guilty and remained quiet for the rest of the session. Therefore, the conflict was resolved by separating from the lone offender, juror four calmly telling juror ten that he said enough and to not say anymore.

How has #3 contradicted himself in Act 2 explain?

Juror 3 said that whenever someone says this, they mean it. When Jurors 3 and 9 started arguing whether it was 15 or 20 seconds to get to his front door, Juror 3 contradicted himself. He said that half the time he was confused. Just before, he kept on saying how the old man was sure of himself.

Was there a hung jury in 12 Angry Men?

As in most American criminal cases, the twelve men must unanimously decide on a verdict of “guilty” or “not guilty”. (In the justice systems of nearly all American states, failure to reach a unanimous verdict, a so-called “hung jury”, results in a mistrial.)