What is better The Hobbit book or movie?

It gives the whole book a folk-tale feel and brings the magical legend to life. The movie does a really good job of helping the audience identify each dwarf by look and personality, but in the book they all (with the exception of Thorin) blend into eachother and to me, one dwarf is interchangeable with another.

Why is The Hobbit movie so different than the book?

The reason that the Hobbit movies are so different from the books on which they are based is because they were directed and co-written by Peter Jackson and not J.R.R. Tolkien.

How similar is The Hobbit movie to the book?

As a novel The Hobbit is 276 pages in its 75th anniversary edition. The Hobbit as film is two hours and 40 minutes long, and encompasses only one-third of the book—and mathematically speaking, we knew there were bound to be some modifications.

Why is The Hobbit book so good?

Tolkien’s The Hobbit Well quite simply it is the style the book is written in that makes it so charming. Unlike his later work, The Hobbit is very simple and very easy to follow. The story flows along nice and quietly with Tolkien taking the reader on a wonderful journey.

Is The Hobbit faithful to the book?

I think it’s reasonable to say that Peter Jackson’s “Hobbit” leaves out much of the detail of the book, and makes some notable changes, but is nonetheless very faithful to the plot; whereas the movie is also intended to enhance the visualization of Middle-earth that was achieved with “The Lord of the Rings”.

Is the Necromancer in The Hobbit book?

The Necromancer is the mysterious villain who Gandalf leaves the company to fight in ”The Hobbit. ” The Necromancer is both plot device and characterization tool in the book, and he is also important to the greater mythology of Middle Earth.

Was The Hobbit book successful?

Written by an Oxford professor for his children, it was published on Sept. 21, 1937, with a first printing of 1,500 copies. An immediate success, it has gone on to sell 100 million copies worldwide — and burrow deep into the hearts of countless generations.

Is The Hobbit a better book than Lord of the Rings?

But, more than anything else, the reason The Hobbit is a better read is because it’s more fun to read. The writing itself is written in a lighthearted way where the narrator inserts himself sometimes. Gandalf is fun and enjoys having a good time in The Hobbit, whereas in Lord of the Rings he’s unbearably serious.

What are the differences between The Hobbit book and the movie?

Striking differences between the Hobbit book and its movie version relate to the use of imagery, dialogue, and alliteration. This essay compares and contrasts the Hobbit book and the movie based on the differences and similarities between the two. In chapter one, the events preceding the quest (the unexpected party) have been modified in the movie.

Is the Hobbit better than Lord of the Rings?

Peter Jackson adapted JRR Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings downright perfectly. In fact, the films are arguably even better than the book in their presentation and execution. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for The Hobbit.

Why do people dislike film adaptations of books?

At times though, the complaints are more than warranted. Sometimes a film can overstretch or cut out detail, completely fail to understand the point of a story, or not capture a good visual representation of what an author was describing. Here are 10 books that have had questionable or weak film adaptations.

Should the Lord of the Rings be split into two movies?

Leaving The Hobbit as one film and then separating each of the incredibly long extended editions of The Lord of the Rings films into two theatrical releases seems like it would have been a better idea. The world of Lord of the Rings is a particularly complex, often borderline nonsensical one.