Why is the OJ Simpson murder case important?

After O.J. Simpson’s 1995 trial, which was a criminal case, the victims’ families sued Simpson for wrongful death. The civil trial began in October 1996. Simpson was found responsible for the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, and their families were awarded $33.5 million in damages.

How did OJ Simpson change the world of forensics?

The OJ Simpson murder trial catapulted the dynamics of criminology and forensics, thrusting the science into the public eye, forever changing how jurors and forensic experts deal with DNA as evidence in criminal trials. OJ Simpson would go on to be acquitted of these murders.

Why was the OJ Simpson trial so important to forensics?

In theory, DNA analysis is the most powerful forensic tool ever discovered. Prosecutors in the Simpson case presented an abundance of DNA evidence that pointed to Mr. Simpson as the killer of his former wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ronald L. Goldman.

What was wrong with the evidence in the OJ Simpson case?

Here are some of the legal errors that students will find in this case: Two important portions from the OJ Simpson case were large, careless, legal violations: He did not have a warrant when he found a bloody, right-hand glove, blood drops around several cars, and a blood trail from the OJ’s vehicle to the front door.

Why is OJ Simpson case considered a good example of poorly handled evidence?

Why is the OJ Simpson case considered a good example of poorly handled evidence? The jurors didn’t try OJ, they tried the evidence. Contaminated the scene.

How was evidence handled in the OJ Simpson case?

Proper Evidence Handling. Today, the lab uses barcodes to scan and track evidence. Crime scenes are also tightly controlled. Trainees, like the one who collected the evidence in the Simpson case, are no longer allowed to handle evidence directly. Instead, trained technicians handle the evidence while trainees watch.

Why did they make OJ put on the gloves?

Many have theorized that the Hall of Famer purposely put his hands in a position where they wouldn’t fit. However, in ESPN’s documentary OJ Simpson: Made in America, Simpson’s agent said that he stopped taking arthritis medications with hopes that the swelling would make the gloves too small.

What evidence was contaminated in the OJ case?

With no witnesses to the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman, DNA evidence in the O. J. Simpson murder case was the key physical proof used by the prosecution to link O. J. Simpson to the crime. Over nine weeks of testimony, 108 exhibits of DNA evidence, including 61 drops of blood, were presented at trial.

Did the gloves really fit OJ?

The glove was covered in blood. According to the prosecution, that blood seeped into the fibers of the leather and shrunk it, thus explaining why Simpson’s hand did not fit inside. Marcia Clark famously opposed using the gloves at all. “I did not want [Simpson] to try on the evidence gloves.

Does blood shrink leather?

DNA tests showed that the right-hand glove bore blood consistent with Simpson’s and both victims. On Friday, Rubin explained to jurors that leather gloves shrink when wet, and said the bloody gloves appeared to have shrunk.